monkeytail wrote:Don't really know who this guy is but it looks as if he has defended the title, although it was against questionable opposition. I know that there has been many times in the past when the champ would go for a week or more with out defending. i.e. Happy Kilmore and not be stripped. I think that if titles are gonna be stripped there should be a set of guidelines as to how or why a champ is stripped. For example if a champ goes for more than 5 days without defending, he gets stripped period doesnt matter why or who he is. For instance, say you went on Vacation for 2 weeks well then you lost your title and #1 ranked gets it automatically.

This is just my opinion, but just as in the HOF criteria there are no set guidelines, and i think we all know if it would have been Larry, HTF, etc. the belt would not have been stripped so quick, and a defense of a title is a defense of a title doesnt matter who it was against. Cause just like in real boxing the champs very seldom take on the toughest competitors in their division unless its a mandatory. Ok ill shut up now...