Title unification matches.

Hello Nigel, Redneck and Salvador.

I would like to try to unify some titles and perhaps try to even make it to super champion. This being said I would also like to offer you gentlemen change to do same.

Please post possible times and dates for title this.

No disrespect but why should you have the chance to fight us to unify the titles, don't you think we would like that chance ourselves?. Best thing to do is to win atleast 3 titles or wait until only two people hold the gold before asking a question like that.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 02/09/2008 02:00:57

No disrespect but perhaps you should read whole post before commenting.

"I would like to try to unify some titles and perhaps try to even make it to super champion. This being said I would also like to offer you gentlemen change to do same.

"don't you think we would like that chance ourselves?."

Yeah and that is exactly why I offered that change in my first post which you obviously did not read with thought. Just for the record I am fully willing to put my own title on the line first (against you if you want to).

"Best thing to do is to win at least 3 titles or wait until only two people hold the gold before asking a question like that."

I do not really understand your logic here. How is any of us supposed to win more than 1 title without boxing each others (called unification matches)? In order for any of us to win more than 1 title there needs to be unification match/matches between existing title holders (you, me, Redneck, Salvador) which brings us back to my firsts post on this thread. See there is no such option as to win 3 or 2 titles without actually having unification matches provided that we all manage to keep our respective belts.

Of course we can all just sit on top of our belts ducking each other waiting for one of us to eventually lose his belt against someone slightly "easier" and then go after that title like bunch of sharks.

This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 02/09/2008 04:07:45

Damn I hit a nerve there. Can't post an opinion on these boards without getting some sarcastic patronising response.

I did read what you said, and that's why I said wait until it's just two guys going at it, surely you can see, it just woulnd't work otherwise, for a start, to get 4 people on and get these matches done in a reasonable amount of time without losing the title to somdebody else is slim and the total fights that would need to take place if we all got a chance at being super champ (worse case scenario (best of 3) is 36 matches. That is not gonna happen, so before you question my logic look at yours, like Is said before it would be easier and make more sense to ask for a shot when people are online or ask in the forums and win a few titles that way and then if there is one guy in your way then have a unification fight.

By the way where does ducking come into the argument?, nobody is saying don't fight each other, you are more than welcome to fight for my title, I just don't want to have nearly 40 matches to decide who is super champ.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 02/09/2008 15:35:00

omg dude everything on these boards get turned into an argument. I wish u guys can just discuss something without arguing all the time and i dont really mean u 2 i mean other people on the boards.

This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 02/09/2008 22:32:20

The Contender wrote:No disrespect but perhaps you should read whole post before commenting.

"I would like to try to unify some titles and perhaps try to even make it to super champion. This being said I would also like to offer you gentlemen change to do same.

"don't you think we would like that chance ourselves?."

Yeah and that is exactly why I offered that change in my first post which you obviously did not read with thought. Just for the record I am fully willing to put my own title on the line first (against you if you want to).

"Best thing to do is to win at least 3 titles or wait until only two people hold the gold before asking a question like that."

I do not really understand your logic here. How is any of us supposed to win more than 1 title without boxing each others (called unification matches)? In order for any of us to win more than 1 title there needs to be unification match/matches between existing title holders (you, me, Redneck, Salvador) which brings us back to my firsts post on this thread. See there is no such option as to win 3 or 2 titles without actually having unification matches provided that we all manage to keep our respective belts.

Of course we can all just sit on top of our belts ducking each other waiting for one of us to eventually lose his belt against someone slightly "easier" and then go after that title like bunch of sharks.

In Nigel's defense, I think he thought you meant that you simply wanted to try to unify by getting a crack at our titles.

I'd be willing to fight for each other's titles. The standard rule would have to apply though. We'd have to beat each other twice in a row to keep the other's title. For example: If I beat you for yours, I'd have to rematch you. If I win the rematch, I keep it. If you win the rematch, you keep it. Then we move on and do the same thing with my title.

You should get to it quick though because right now I'm very vulnerable. I still haven't quite adjusted to the recent modification.

Well all I got to say is this: good luck gentlemen. I am just looking forwards to some tough and enjoyable matches regardless of who wins or loses (yeah but I do like winning

).

It seems Skillz will be unify the belts. He hold two titles and can get the third one by default (OBW is vacant and skillz is ranked number 1). Red Viper hold the other title. Lets see if skillz can unify!

Dick wrote:It seems Skillz will be unify the belts. He hold two titles and can get the third one by default (OBW is vacant and skillz is ranked number 1). Red Viper hold the other title. Lets see if skillz can unify!

Hopefully, he won't just sit on the titles and pick and choose unification matches against certain people only. That degrades the meaning of the unification process.

I held the OBC title for a few weeks and defended it a bunch of times. If you were ranked, I gave you a shot if you wanted it.

Skillz seems like a really solid, upstanding guy, so I don't think he's going to duck defenses in fear of losing either title.