November Top 10

This message was edited 8 times. Last update was at 13/11/2010 19:59:08

I think we can have a good Top 10 now. Mikkel is included since he fought for title a few times.

1. James A. Braddock
2. Unstoppable
3. Here To FIght
4. Dick E. Boon
5. Steven Seagal
6. The Sniper
7. TRPCHE
8. Toosmooth
9. DJINN
10. Popeye

Just below top 10

The Sickness
Couture
Slugger
Maxie
Alca Trazz

Most Improved Fighter of November- Maxie

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 13/11/2010 11:07:39

i dont send any Top10 here because its nonsense like i see in your list John.
I agree with the first ones of your list because this guys wins more than i do if i face them. But the second part of your list is funny because i win more than i lose against everyone in that list (except Trpche and Mikkel maybe because Trpche won our last matches more than i won and against Mikkel i just fought 1 time and he won that.).
So....what is the sense in making a Top10 without objektivity? If you are so keen on making a top10 you should do it mathematical. I agree that it is not that easy when i use different names (and a few other OB-players also do..).

But if you have fun with Top10-Opinion-lists carry on with it. For me this lists without mathematical basis and just Opinions are fairytales

The idea is not bad john, but i need the facts in such lists...so someone can do it mathematical and we need just 1 list. This Opinion-Lists are funny...6-7 lists from different players with absolutely different Top10. That is fun but not a good list.

Redneck

Redneck wrote:i dont send any Top10 here because its nonsense like i see in your list John.
I agree with the first ones of your list because this guys wins more than i do if i face them. But the second part of your list is funny because i win more than i lose against everyone in that list (except Trpche and Mikkel maybe because Trpche won our last matches more than i won and against Mikkel i just fought 1 time and he won that.).
So....what is the sense in making a Top10 without objektivity? If you are so keen on making a top10 you should do it mathematical. I agree that it is not that easy when i use different names (and a few other OB-players also do..).

But if you have fun with Top10-Opinion-lists carry on with it. For me this lists without mathematical basis and just Opinions are fairytales

The idea is not bad john, but i need the facts in such lists...so someone can do it mathematical and we need just 1 list. This Opinion-Lists are funny...6-7 lists from different players with absolutely different Top10. That is fun but not a good list.

Redneck

You forsure haven't beat me sucka I don't know what your talkin about.

johnbludger wrote:I think we can have a good Top 10 now. Mikkel is included since he fought for title a few times.

1. John
2. Unstoppable
3. Fatny
4. HTF
5. Dick E. Boon
6. Mikkel
7. The Sniper
8. TRPCHE
9. Slugger
10. The Sickness

Just below top 10

Redneck
Toosmooth
Couture
Maxie
Alca Trazz

Most Improved Fighter of November- Maxie

and when has fatny been fighting?

Surj wrote:

Redneck wrote:i dont send any Top10 here because its nonsense like i see in your list John.
I agree with the first ones of your list because this guys wins more than i do if i face them. But the second part of your list is funny because i win more than i lose against everyone in that list (except Trpche and Mikkel maybe because Trpche won our last matches more than i won and against Mikkel i just fought 1 time and he won that.).
So....what is the sense in making a Top10 without objektivity? If you are so keen on making a top10 you should do it mathematical. I agree that it is not that easy when i use different names (and a few other OB-players also do..).

But if you have fun with Top10-Opinion-lists carry on with it. For me this lists without mathematical basis and just Opinions are fairytales

The idea is not bad john, but i need the facts in such lists...so someone can do it mathematical and we need just 1 list. This Opinion-Lists are funny...6-7 lists from different players with absolutely different Top10. That is fun but not a good list.

Redneck

You forsure haven't beat me sucka I don't know what your talkin about.

i attacked you somehow? Why you call me sucka you moron?
Here are just a few fights where i beat your ass:
this two here are from yesterday and there were just this two..lol:
http://www.onlineboxing.net/scorecard/789226
http://www.onlineboxing.net/scorecard/789225

here i beat you with my Djinn...:
http://www.onlineboxing.net/scorecard/786662
http://www.onlineboxing.net/scorecard/787133

if you count every fight i am 3:1 against you moron!

-->you know my names john. Count the fights i won and lose against this clown and you see what i mean.

Redneck

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 13/11/2010 19:05:39

johnbludger wrote:I think we can have a good Top 10 now. Mikkel is included since he fought for title a few times.

1. John
2. Unstoppable
3. Fatny
4. HTF
5. Dick E. Boon
6. Mikkel
7. The Sniper
8. TRPCHE
9. Slugger
10. The Sickness

Just below top 10

Redneck
Toosmooth
Couture
Maxie
Alca Trazz

Most Improved Fighter of November- Maxie

DONT WANNA ADD HTF or FATNY AS NEITHER OF THEM ARE ACTIVE ENOUGH TO BE CONSIDERED...

1)James A. Braddock
2)Unstoppable
3)Steven Seagal
4)Dick E. Boon
5)The Sniper
6)TRPCHE
7)Emile/toosmooth

popeye
9)Slugger
10)REDNECK

I do my rankings by people who give me the hardest time...Spots 7-10 are up in the air and easily shuffleble<----if thats a word

By the way Padimir disappeared...

Redneck wrote:i dont send any Top10 here because its nonsense like i see in your list John.
I agree with the first ones of your list because this guys wins more than i do if i face them. But the second part of your list is funny because i win more than i lose against everyone in that list (except Trpche and Mikkel maybe because Trpche won our last matches more than i won and against Mikkel i just fought 1 time and he won that.).
So....what is the sense in making a Top10 without objektivity? If you are so keen on making a top10 you should do it mathematical. I agree that it is not that easy when i use different names (and a few other OB-players also do..).

But if you have fun with Top10-Opinion-lists carry on with it. For me this lists without mathematical basis and just Opinions are fairytales

The idea is not bad john, but i need the facts in such lists...so someone can do it mathematical and we need just 1 list. This Opinion-Lists are funny...6-7 lists from different players with absolutely different Top10. That is fun but not a good list.

Redneck

Well I fixed it for you, Looks better but your are wrong with beating almost everyone on my previous list. I know you dont beat me, mikkel, unstop, fatny, htf, boon more then we do. I'm keeping HTF in there has been playing alot this month. Fatny I took off.

Not really been playing loging in yes. Been dealing with the crap server/connection. Cant fight on it.

johnbludger wrote:

Redneck wrote:i dont send any Top10 here because its nonsense like i see in your list John.
I agree with the first ones of your list because this guys wins more than i do if i face them. But the second part of your list is funny because i win more than i lose against everyone in that list (except Trpche and Mikkel maybe because Trpche won our last matches more than i won and against Mikkel i just fought 1 time and he won that.).
So....what is the sense in making a Top10 without objektivity? If you are so keen on making a top10 you should do it mathematical. I agree that it is not that easy when i use different names (and a few other OB-players also do..).

But if you have fun with Top10-Opinion-lists carry on with it. For me this lists without mathematical basis and just Opinions are fairytales

The idea is not bad john, but i need the facts in such lists...so someone can do it mathematical and we need just 1 list. This Opinion-Lists are funny...6-7 lists from different players with absolutely different Top10. That is fun but not a good list.

Redneck

Well I fixed it for you, Looks better but your are wrong with beating almost everyone on my previous list. I know you dont beat me, mikkel, unstop, fatny, htf, boon more then we do. I'm keeping HTF in there has been playing alot this month. Fatny I took off.

No you are right with that john. Read again my posting...."I agree with the first ones of your list because this guys wins more than i do if i face them". Didnt read that?

Redneck wrote:

johnbludger wrote:

Redneck wrote:i dont send any Top10 here because its nonsense like i see in your list John.
I agree with the first ones of your list because this guys wins more than i do if i face them. But the second part of your list is funny because i win more than i lose against everyone in that list (except Trpche and Mikkel maybe because Trpche won our last matches more than i won and against Mikkel i just fought 1 time and he won that.).
So....what is the sense in making a Top10 without objektivity? If you are so keen on making a top10 you should do it mathematical. I agree that it is not that easy when i use different names (and a few other OB-players also do..).

But if you have fun with Top10-Opinion-lists carry on with it. For me this lists without mathematical basis and just Opinions are fairytales

The idea is not bad john, but i need the facts in such lists...so someone can do it mathematical and we need just 1 list. This Opinion-Lists are funny...6-7 lists from different players with absolutely different Top10. That is fun but not a good list.

Redneck

Well I fixed it for you, Looks better but your are wrong with beating almost everyone on my previous list. I know you dont beat me, mikkel, unstop, fatny, htf, boon more then we do. I'm keeping HTF in there has been playing alot this month. Fatny I took off.

No you are right with that john. Read again my posting...."I agree with the first ones of your list because this guys wins more than i do if i face them". Didnt read that?

I read it but im talking about this

"But the second part of your list is funny because i win more than i lose against everyone in that list (except Trpche and Mikkel maybe because Trpche won our last matches more than i won and against Mikkel i just fought 1 time and he won that."

Redneck wrote:

Surj wrote:

Redneck wrote:i dont send any Top10 here because its nonsense like i see in your list John.
I agree with the first ones of your list because this guys wins more than i do if i face them. But the second part of your list is funny because i win more than i lose against everyone in that list (except Trpche and Mikkel maybe because Trpche won our last matches more than i won and against Mikkel i just fought 1 time and he won that.).
So....what is the sense in making a Top10 without objektivity? If you are so keen on making a top10 you should do it mathematical. I agree that it is not that easy when i use different names (and a few other OB-players also do..).

But if you have fun with Top10-Opinion-lists carry on with it. For me this lists without mathematical basis and just Opinions are fairytales

The idea is not bad john, but i need the facts in such lists...so someone can do it mathematical and we need just 1 list. This Opinion-Lists are funny...6-7 lists from different players with absolutely different Top10. That is fun but not a good list.

Redneck

You forsure haven't beat me sucka I don't know what your talkin about.

i attacked you somehow? Why you call me sucka you moron?
Here are just a few fights where i beat your ass:
this two here are from yesterday and there were just this two..lol:
http://www.onlineboxing.net/scorecard/789226
http://www.onlineboxing.net/scorecard/789225

here i beat you with my Djinn...:
http://www.onlineboxing.net/scorecard/786662
http://www.onlineboxing.net/scorecard/787133

if you count every fight i am 3:1 against you moron!

-->you know my names john. Count the fights i won and lose against this clown and you see what i mean.

Redneck

It's funny because you actually see me give up because your connection is shit. And bro I was only kidding chill the hell out is sucka a horrible insult where you come from?

my connection is the best around

. Ok i agree that sometimes it is a little bit slower than singleplayer was. But under normal condition its fluent and fast enough to have a fight with fun. Its not always the players that cause some lags. Very often its the server or the site.
And sucker is the serioust thing you can say to someone where i live (heard rumours that we got a deadly shooting after someone called the other one sucka last night..).
...but is moron such a horrible insult where you come from? I never wanted to piss you off with that, just talked to you in your "sucka"-level.
I like you surj..you told me to chill, so come on now and do it for yourself.
What do i read here? Postings that you wanna left OB behind? Are you fucking kidding me? We need Vets like you here. Think about that and stay to death

Redneck

Redneck wrote:what is the sense in making a Top10 without objektivity? If you are so keen on making a top10 you should do it mathematical.

But if you have fun with Top10-Opinion-lists carry on with it. For me this lists without mathematical basis and just Opinions are fairytales

The idea is not bad john, but i need the facts in such lists...so someone can do it mathematical and we need just 1 list. This Opinion-Lists are funny...6-7 lists from different players with absolutely different Top10. That is fun but not a good list.

Hey check it out, I found I automatically updated mathematical ranking system for OB.

Ray Johnson wrote:

Redneck wrote:what is the sense in making a Top10 without objektivity? If you are so keen on making a top10 you should do it mathematical.

But if you have fun with Top10-Opinion-lists carry on with it. For me this lists without mathematical basis and just Opinions are fairytales

The idea is not bad john, but i need the facts in such lists...so someone can do it mathematical and we need just 1 list. This Opinion-Lists are funny...6-7 lists from different players with absolutely different Top10. That is fun but not a good list.

Hey check it out, I found I automatically updated mathematical ranking system for OB.

LOL

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 16/11/2010 15:11:27

Ray Johnson wrote:

Redneck wrote:what is the sense in making a Top10 without objektivity? If you are so keen on making a top10 you should do it mathematical.

But if you have fun with Top10-Opinion-lists carry on with it. For me this lists without mathematical basis and just Opinions are fairytales

The idea is not bad john, but i need the facts in such lists...so someone can do it mathematical and we need just 1 list. This Opinion-Lists are funny...6-7 lists from different players with absolutely different Top10. That is fun but not a good list.

Hey check it out, I found I automatically updated mathematical ranking system for OB.

to the point like i know it from you

there is only one problem. I saw a few fighters on OB that only fight against weaker opponents that got a streak of 1 to get more points and get higher in rank. Fighter that fight every opponent, doesnt matter if weaker or not lose loads of points with that while this other fighters get more and more points.
So it often happen that better fighters rank on place 15-20 while a fighter that is easy for them to beat is ranked 5-10 (and refuse to fight).
Thats the weakness of that ranking system and gives John the right to do such Top-Ten lists.
If someday there would be a ranking system without such weak points Top-Ten-Lists made on opinions are bs. But at the moment this lists are more accurate than the ranking-system.