M. A R A G O N wrote:
Red Viper wrote:The next list Top 10 OB Busts of all-time will come in soon.
Here is the rules to be a bust
1. Having less than five titles in a two years or more span
2 Having less than 10 title defences in all
3. Showing little or no improvement
4. Creating zero impact in this game
5. Having a very poor record
6. Excessive Padding
7.Getting beat by 90% of the OB Fighters
8. Having a 500 loss or more differential and never defeated an skilled opponent
9. All of the above
let me try and make that list a little smaller for you, because your putting in requirements that dont need to be there.
you say, showing little to no improvement and in the next one little impact. Most likely if they had no improvement, they also had little impact, so lets just delete rule 4, because its pretty much the same as rule 3.
Also, rule 5 says poor record, and rule 6 says excessive padding. if they excessivly padding, their record will not be poor. so lets just remove rule 6. rule 7 also says losing to 90% of fighters, which would = a poor record, little improvement and little impact, so lets ixnay that rule also. this leaves us with the following.
1. Having less than five titles in a two years or more span
2 Having less than 10 title defences in all
3. Showing little or no improvement
5. Having a very poor record
8. Having a 500 loss or more differential and never defeated an skilled opponent
9. All of the above
Lets just remove rule 9 because it doesnt need to be there at all. now, rule 3 showing little improvement, would lead to 5, which is a poor record, so having a poor record would show that the person had little improvement. delete rule 3. leaves us with:
1. Having less than five titles in a two years or more span
2 Having less than 10 title defences in all
5. Having a very poor record
8. Having a 500 loss or more differential and never defeated an skilled opponent
from here, we can say that technically, rule 5 and 8 are pretty much the same, depending on what someone considers a poor record. personally, 500 loss or more to me is a poor record, so lets delete rule 8. now if someone has a poor record, as shown in rule 5, they most likely will have less then 5 titles in 2 years, because they cant beat hardly anyone, so they cant rise in rank to fight the champs, then since they suck, wont be able to beat the champs if they do get in the top 20. so that leaves rule 2 and 5. however, rule 2 goes somewhat with rule 1, because if you cant get a title, you probably cant defend it. So that leaves 1 rule. which is your rule 5.
5. Having a very poor record
#5 is legit because a bust means that they had potential ( like all new players) but they have a poor record. in sports, someone who excels in college but his numbers lack in the pros are busts. no one has seen a bust win a title in the pros. so in order to be a bust, you must only have a crap record. saves everyone lots of time now when trying to make a top 10 bust.